HOME

 ALLIANCE
 - Introduction
 - Alliance Members
 - Goals & Priorities
 - Contacts


ROUNDTABLE
 - Introduction
 - Benefits
 - Model
 - Guidelines
 - Calendar
 - Past Offerings


AUTHOR TALKS
 - Introduction
 - Upcoming Talks
 - Past Talks
 - Procedures


CONFERENCE
 - Introduction
 - Guidelines
 - Awards
 - Past Conferences
 - Save the Date
    for our next conference

 

N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7.

Comment in:
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1520-2.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):814;
author reply 814-5. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):814;
author reply 814-5.

Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB.
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL, USA.

BACKGROUND: Conous infusions of sedative drugs in the intensive care unit may prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation, prolong the length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital, impede efforts to perform daily neurologic examinations, and increase the need for tests to assess alterations in mental status. Whether regular interruption of such infusions might accelerate recovery is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial involving 128 adult patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation and continuous infusions of sedative drugs in a medical intensive care unit. In the intervention group, the sedative infusions were interrupted until the patients were awake, on a daily basis; in the control group, the infusions were interrupted only at the discretion of the clinicians in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 4.9 days in the intervention group, as compared with 7.3 days in the control group (P=0.004), and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 6.4 days as compared with 9.9 days, respectively (P=0.02). Six of the patients in the intervention group (9 percent) underwent diagnostic testing to assess changes in mental status, as compared with 16 of the patients in the control group (27 percent, P=0.02). Complications (e.g., removal of the endotracheal tube by the patient) occurred in three of the patients in the intervention group (4 percent) and four of the patients in the control group (7 percent, P=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit.

Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 10816184 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Return to Roundtables

 

Some documents on this website are provided in Adobe Acrobat® format.

This page was last modified on 10/11/2011 05:48 PM

© 2011 www.ctnursingresearchalliance.org

Contact Amy Schroder, Webmaster,
aschrod@harthosp.org concerning this website.

 Website hosted by: